Archive | Autos

Review: Falling In And Out Of Love With A Benz

Review: Falling In And Out Of Love With A Benz

e350

By Aaron Cole, THE AURORA SENTINEL
Every gorgeous car comes with a catch.
It’s either: hysterically impractical; as testy as Gary Busey on a four-day bender; going to cost you as much as a Space Shuttle launch; or, its made by Mercedes Benz — which in that case, it’s sometimes all of the above.
While Benz’s are famously easy to love, they’re sometimes famous for being supermodel-hard on the pocketbook and garage queens just waiting for their next repair. Fitting or not, Benz’s have been famously fussy automobiles.
So what’s a guy to think when a shiny new 2010 Mercedes Benz E-class coupe appears?
Just like the last time, love stinks.
e350
Of course, this car really will never be track tested. The most vigorous handling challenge it’s likely to face in its privileged life is up and down a windy Aspen road in the summer and the rigors of garage life in the winter.
And that’s okay. Like most of what comes out of Stuttgart, its superb chops will hardly be tested in a McDonalds drive-thru window.
But once — and I was hoping this would be the moment — I’d like a $50,000 Benz ($59,225 as tested, add $6,000 more for the V8, give or take) to give mere mortals a taste of what its $200,000 supercars have always had: show-stopping looks, a seductive motor and a gentle touch on the track.
But just like Meat Loaf said, “Two out of three ain’t bad.”
Our E coupe was fitted with Mercedes’ 3.5-liter V6, and powered aptly down the road. While it’s a lot to ask 268 horses to power two tons, the E350 did it nicely at 17 mpg in the city and 26 mpg on the highway. I am inclined to believe the bigger-sister E550, which is fitted with a 5.5-liter V8 worth 382 horsepower, goes like stink.
Nevertheless, I was never left really wanting from the E350’s engine. Asking the E350 to gallivant from 0-60 takes a mere 6.2 seconds; in the E550 that number drops to around 5 seconds. The 6-cylinder really doesn’t have an exhaust note to speak of, but when pushed into its power band, the E350 bellows a raspy snarl from its dual exhaust.
Actually enjoying the E350’s derring-do was the biggest surprise to me, because generally speaking — even for Mercedes — the smaller, less-expensive coupe is generally the “get you in the door” coupe with the real tigers in the back of the showroom, ready to pounce on your heart and your pocketbook.
As a result, I wouldn’t kick the E350 out of bed for lack of trying. Similarly, I wouldn’t turn one away on looks either.
If you’re looking for mouth-open, spit-drying, teeth-hurting classic good looks, the E-class coupe is it.
It’s possible to parade the E-class coupe in any classical beauty pageant and ride home in a winner — I firmly believe that.
From the frameless windows, sharp-angled headlamps and badges, to the rear fenders cascading over the rear tires like the Ponton coupes from the late 1950s, Mercedes is a strikingly good-looking car from front to back.
Inside, the view is no different either. The same angles dominate the swank interior digs.
As the coupe name would imply, this car is supremely comfortable with a driver and a passenger, although it wouldn’t be a stretch to throw a kid or two in the back for short trips.
What’s new this year is the Attention Assist program that watches you watching the road. And if you seem to be a little sleepy, the Benz will blare a 21-gun salute or something comparable in your face and tell you to pull over and take a nap. Also, Mercedes touts its car will brake for you should you temporarily lose sanity and decide to hurdle your $60,000 car toward something without restraint. I chose to do neither in our test model, and I’ll trust Mercedes that the systems are there without testing either.
Our test version was fitted with the whole kit: satellite navigation, heated and cooled seats, and an electro-pneumatically controlled four-way lumbar system. If I’m honest, I could do without the complex air-bladder system pushing and pulling my kidneys and associated vertebrae in strange positions.
But sometimes it’s not about the massage as much as it is the masseur — and this one could use a lighter touch in another department.
Please understand, the E-coupe handles great for a luxury coupe. But your granddad drives a luxury coupe, too — he calls it a ’76 Cadillac Eldorado.
The steering isn’t mushy or unresponsive, it’s just not as agile as a lighter sports coupe should be. It’s like steering a drunk socialite into her limousine, you’re not going to get there without a some dips, bends and a little frustration.
I can see how they got here.
Previously, the car was badged with a CLK moniker, meaning it was a closer kin to the lighter, smaller C-class than the E-class.
Even though this year’s model has essentially the same skeleton, the E coupe earns the badging by being closer to the larger E-class is appearances and approach.
Sadly, the turning isn’t as crisp and the body doesn’t feel as glued to the asphalt as I would have hoped. I’d love the E coupe to feel like a millionaire’s supercar, but instead, it just feels like a very good car.
And that’s the rub.
The new E350 coupe is love at first sight, but it was where the rubber literally meets the road that this relationship fell tantalizingly short.
I’ll be ready to love again — I was just hoping this was the one.
Final Verdict: Three and one quarter stars out of four. To say that the 2010 Mercedes Benz E-class coupe is a head-turning car is an understatement — it’s a head-torqueing seductress. It just happens that this one, like many runway models, has trouble dealing with in anything other than a straight line. That’ll change soon though.
Aaron Cole is the managing editor of The Aurora Sentinel. Reach him at acole@aurorasentinel.com or at 303-750-7555.

Posted in Autos, Front PageComments (0)

Review: Lexus GS 350 Is Powerful And Slick

Review: Lexus GS 350 Is Powerful And Slick

LexusG350

By Peter Marcus, DENVER DAILY NEWS
The 2009 Lexus GS 350 makes you wish you owned a sweeping piece of property complete with curving racetrack.
Powerful and slick, this GS boasts an impressive 3.5-liter V6 engine that produces 303 horsepower and 274 pound-feet of torque. With all that power, it’s a shame drivers of this vehicle have to go easy on the pedal — pushing pedal to the metal on this Lexus four-door sedan would most definitely result in a speeding ticket — if not immediately, then surely in the not-to-distant future.
Hence the dream of a personal racetrack.
Until then, the average driver will just have to admire the power and tight handling of this luxury midsize performance sedan.
The model we tested was enhanced by available all-wheel drive, an interior that takes even the classiest up a notch and a long list of standard and optional features.
Several of the “experts” out there have deprived the GS 350 of best-in-class ranking, but this reporter certainly believes Lexus has leveled the playing field with its GS 350.
Available in only one trim level — as is standard for Lexus vehicles — the GS 350 comes in either all-wheel or rear-wheel drive. The sedan comes standard with 17-inch alloy wheels, perforated leather, push button start/stop, moonroof, a multi-information touch screen, and a 10-speaker audio system with cassette player, to name a few features. That’s right, the GS 350 comes with a cassette player. They still make those?
Options on the model we tested included rear park assist, a rear spoiler, satellite radio, and a 14-speaker Mark Levinson DVD surround-sound system, to name a few.
The six-speed sequential shift automatic transmission is the only one offered, but it did a good job of shifting through gears quickly and with ease.
From actual polished wood accents to its aluminum trim, the GS 350 offers an incredibly luxurious cabin with plenty of room. The sedan seats five relatively comfortably depending on exactly who you’re trying to fit in the back seat. The elevated rear center seat can be a tight fit from time to time, but it’s nothing to really criticize.
We really liked driving this Lexus around town — especially on the highway where we could let it loose a little bit.
Definitely consider competitors like the BMW 5 Series and Infiniti M35 before making a final decision — but the GS 350 seemed to have it all.

2009 Lexus GS 350
STARTING PRICE: $46,950
TRANSMISSION: Six-speed automatic
GAS MILEAGE PER GALLON: 18 city, 25 highway
WHO IS THIS FOR: Someone looking for a sporty sedan that can go really, really fast

Posted in Autos, Front PageComments (1)

Saturday Air-Car Show At Front Range Includes Free Prostate-Center Screens

Saturday Air-Car Show At Front Range Includes Free Prostate-Center Screens

Tomorrow, the Urology Center of Colorado Foundation and Front Range Airport are having their fifth annual Classic Aircraft and Car Show. The family-friendly event includes an aerobatic aircraft performance as well as free prostate-cancer screenings for men.

CarAirShow_Screenings

Posted in Autos, Featured Stories, HealthComments (0)

Review: Drivers’ Needs Come First In 2010 Subaru Legacy

Review: Drivers’ Needs Come First In 2010 Subaru Legacy

By Aaron Cole, THE AURORA SENTINEL
To quote a Subaru salesman who shall remain nameless for a lot of reasons:
“Subaru doesn’t make cars for you or me. As a matter of fact, I don’t know who they make cars for, they just make ‘em. And they make ‘em really good sometimes — and really strange sometimes.”
I’m serious. In the middle of a sales pitch, a Subaru dealer told me he thinks his employer — the people who sign his checks every two weeks — doesn’t listen to the customer.
And in a way, he’s right. Subaru has always been a little out there. From huge-winged, street-legal rally cars to the horizontally opposed boxer engine that powers all their cars, Subaru is the Apple Computers of the automotive world. They’ll do it their way, your opinion be damned.
For better or worse, the streak has been broken. The 2010 Subaru Legacy is the first car, I believe, that has been built with the customer in mind first.
Oh, sure, the quirky characteristics of a Subaru have made the trip with the all-new Legacy. Subaru still puts their perplexing, clattering boxer engine in the Legacy. And like every Subaru built since the Big Bang, the new Legacy gets all-wheel drive.
But rather it’s the size, build and feel of the new Legacy that makes me think that my salesman friend may need to sing a different tune.
Firstly, the new Legacy feels — and actually is — bigger than last year.
This is the 20th year Subaru has offered the Legacy, but this year the mid-sized sedan finally hit puberty. The Legacy grew 3 inches taller, and nearly 4 inches wider with a longer wheelbase to boot and a more-aggressive, blunter nose. What that means inside the Legacy is more headroom, a little more legroom and a more grown-up style that previous offerings didn’t have.
Last year’s Legacy, although refined, felt more like a bigger Impreza, whereas this year’s model has an identity all its own. The interior feels separate from other Subaru vehicles, which typically means that the Legacy will carry the standard that other models will soon follow.
The center console is stacked taller, and the climate controls feel a little more intuitive than last year’s offering. Legroom in the back is also vastly improved, adding more than four inches from last year according to the manufacturer, or an acre and a half according to me.
But all of the improvements smack of complaints dropped into a “Customer Comment Box.”
“More legroom,” wrote Cam from Kentucky. “More headroom,” wrote Stephen from Virginia. “I’m too stupid, I don’t know how to turn the A/C on,” wrote Aaron from Colorado. All of the above went into the latest design for the Legacy, and it shows.
As for the numbers, Subaru offers the Legacy in essentially three different models: The 2.5i, the 2.5 GT and the 3.6R. All of the above have different combinations of comforts that will win you different combinations of letters and words after the above-mentioned titles; however, the difference lies in the powertrains.
The 2.5i is a 2.5-liter, four-cylinder engine worth 170 bhp. As this was the model given to me to test, I can affirm that, indeed, a mid-sized sedan can have all-wheel drive and be powered by this engine. Ours was mated with a 6-speed manual gearbox that offers the best engine-transmission combo for this model, as Subaru’s CVT automatic probably won’t set any hearts on fire.
The 2.5 GT is fitted with a turbocharged 2.5-liter four banger that was fitted in a 2.5 GT Impreza that I tested about a year ago. This is also the engine that was fitted into the WRX last year, and while it offers a lot of smiles when the boost kicks in, the turbo lag in the Impreza was a little too much.
Much more intriguing is the 3.6R that is fitted with a normally breathing 6-cylinder, 256 bhp engine that is sure to scream through four tires in minutes.
Handling in the new Legacy is a dream — as most Subarus have always been — partly because the low-slung engine offers a low center of gravity that keeps the rubbers glued to the road at all times.
That is proof enough that while Subaru has definitely taken some comments to heart, others, like the boxer engine, will remain no matter the objections.
And it’s enough to leave me wondering: If Subaru were allowed to build the car they really want, how much different would it look like?

FINAL VERDICT: Two and three quarter stars out of four. The 2010 Subaru Legacy comes in as the cheapest all-wheel drive, mid-sized sedan money can buy. But with more legroom, and a smarter interior, has Subaru dampened the unique flavor that it offered compared to its rivals?\

Aaron Cole is the managing editor of The Aurora Sentinel. Reach him at 303-750-7555 or at acole@aurorasentinel.com.

Distributed by Colorado Capitol Reporters

Posted in Autos, Front PageComments (0)

Review: The 2010 Jaguar XKR

Review: The 2010 Jaguar XKR

By Aaron Cole, THE AURORA SENTINEL
For everything bad I ever said about Jaguar, I’m sorry.
I’m sorry for the laughing and pointing at every blue-haired XJ I ever passed that was broken down on the side of the road. I’m sorry for looking down on the X-Type as a gussied-up Ford.
I’m even sorry for hinting that the recent acquisition of British-born Jaguar by Indian econo-automaker Tata Motors would spell certain doom for the traditional fanciful English racecar driving that Jaguar has delivered for so many decades.
I’m not wrong in the sense of “refuting-global-warming” wrong; this is wrong in the sense of “denying-that-the-earth-is-round” wrong.
Jaguars aren’t meant for grandpas and trophy wives addicted to plastic surgery.
Some are born and bred to scream, sprint and induce pleasure-driven convulsions.
And I’ve got news for you: at a shade over $100,000, the 2010 Jaguar XKR is worth every penny — and more.
Its animal power and orgasmic exhaust defy you to lust over another Ferrari, laugh in the face of a Lambo, cause Corvette owners to cower and cringe, and turn a skeptic into putty in its leather-fitted, low-slung seats.
First, the details: The 2010 XKR is Jaguar’s best and fastest car they’ll sell to the public without a four-point racing harness. The 5.0-liter, supercharged V8 produces a throaty, face-ripping 510 bhp and 625 ft-lbs of torque that bend the fabric of space-time and ask Einstein to revisit his laws of general relativity as it pertains to speed.
It’s actually a sizable increase over last year’s offering, a 4.2-liter V8 that produced 420 horsepower, but — and it’s a big but — Jaguar says the bigger engine this year gets the same fuel efficiency and meets the same emission standards as the car last year. In fact, when Jaguar announced the 2010 XKR, they touted that it wouldn’t even incur a gas-guzzler tax when shipped to the states — a wonder considering the Brits at Coventry have never thought too highly of auto restrictions here in the New World.
The motor is the same powerplant that can be found in the XFR, which means that as far as I know, this is the first solely in-house designed engine developed by Jaguar and regains the racing heritage it may have lost in years prior.
The workhorse under the hood is lovingly wrapped by a new, more blunt exterior body developed and designed by Ian Callum, the man we can thank for the short-staining beauty of the Aston Martin DB7.
The main difference this year is in the XKR’s beak — once a long, tapering shadow that bored onlookers, the 2010 features a blunt, sharp mouth with two wide chrome grilles ready to eat children.
The notion that the XKR appears to be fast while parked is purely false: the XKR shouldn’t be parked near elementary schools because it appears ready to pounce would be more accurate.
But while parked, you’d be depriving yourself of the XKR’s biggest secret: its sound. At full revs the XKR barks and bellows like a personal symphony. Every note — as explained by Jaguar engineers when the 2010 XKR was revealed — is precise and transmitted through an acoustic exhaust system designed new for this year.
Its raspy voice gurgles and belches horsepower at every twinge of the throttle, and listening to the XKR cackle as the brute decelerates is almost worth the price of admission alone.
But where the exterior, luxurious interior, engine and exhaust perfectly collide is in the Jag’s performance.
A 0-60 sprint will take you just 4.6 seconds. Accelerating from 50-70 takes just 1.9, and our test version, the XKR Convertible, amazingly sacrifices none of the performance to lose its top.
To say that the Jaguar XKR is amazing is wrong. When compared to cars that cost twice as much for the same performance, to say that the $107,000 Jaguar XKR is a supercar, however, is spot on.
I’m surely not wrong on that.

FINAL VERDICT: Four stars out of four. Truly a supercar, the Jaguar XKR offers a thrilling ride at every level. From taut, perfectly contoured leather and striking exterior, to gut-turning, intoxicating performance and exhaust note, the Jaguar XKR is pure-bred British racing at its best.

Aaron Cole is the managing editor of The Aurora Sentinel. Reach him at 303-750-7555 or at acole@aurorasentinel.com.

Distributed by Colorado Capitol Reporters

Posted in Autos, Featured StoriesComments (0)

Autos: New MKZ A Middle-Of-The-Road Offering

Autos: New MKZ A Middle-Of-The-Road Offering

By Aaron Cole, THE AURORA SENTINEL
Brand loyalty, one discovers, goes hand-in-hand with insanity.
For instance, I’d walk barefoot through the Gobi to pay thousands of dollars for an obscure, small, German camera made by Leica. Panasonic makes them (pah!) though I’d never buy one, and probably bested in every respect by Nikon or Canon (ha!), to which I’d rather gulp down Drano than own either.
See what I mean?
To wit, Lincoln makes automobiles to a similarly deranged audience.
First, one must navigate a brutal assault of letters to decipher the true model. Lincoln makes the MKS, MKZ, MKX and MKT. Don’t look for any ascendancy of size to letters; the MKZ is smaller than MKX, which is smaller than the MKS, which are all bested by the MKT — all of which mean nothing to buyers who aren’t loyal Lincoln fanatics or naval cryptologists.
Second, one must pass every other dealership to find a small, crusty corner in a crowded Ford and Mercury lot, to gander at a handful of Lincoln cars. Spotting D.B. Cooper is easier some days than finding a Lincoln lot.
Lastly, one must disregard nearly every printed or spoken word about Lincolns — the same is true for Sarah Palin fans — and go with blind brand loyalty to drive a purchase decision like the 2010 Lincoln MKZ.
Squat, stout and every bit a Ford Fusion, the redesigned MKZ takes over where the Lincoln Zephyr left off. To be brutally honest, I had never heard of the Zephyr prior to driving the MKZ, so its discontinuance is met with little sadness on my part.
For your $35,000, Lincoln promises to give you more than the other guy at the entry-level luxury market. Sights set on Cadillac, Acura, Infiniti and Lexus, the Lincoln MKZ delivers indulgent Bridge of Weir leather seats all the way from Renfrewshire, Scotland, wood trim all the way from Hermasillo, Mexico, and backup assistance all the way from Volvo.
What you don’t get is speed (Cadillac), comfort (Lexus) or superior interior (Acura). You know, the things that matter.
(Hiding quietly is the comparison Lincoln doesn’t want to make with the Audi A4 Quattro, which, by all accounts is a better car.)
Where the MKZ makes its play is on people who are looking for its brothers — the Ford Fusion and Mercury Whoknowsit — but want a softer feel in the seat of their pants.
The V6 engine, shared with the sport version of the Ford Fusion, is standard in the MKZ and powers the sedan nicely on roads. Though not overpowering, and not class-leading despite some strange claims by Lincoln (the Cadillac CTS blows past it every day of the week), it’s agreeable and slightly surprising.
The redesigned grille is eye-catching and the interior is spacious is whisper quiet.
However, it’s in the details — overlooked by every brand loyal true believer — that the Lincoln makes a move to the middle.
The dash is made of the same plastic used in a Ford Focus. The knobs and interior are borrowed from a 1995 Ford Taurus, and the handling is something out of a Ford F-150.
It’s hard to overlook that when you’re not hopelessly devoted to Lincoln in the first place.
Nonetheless, Lincoln, in their small corners of small Ford lots, is still in business, which means someone is still buying.
And it’s people like me who search out these uncommon brands in dingy corners of specialty stores that keep devotion synonymous with conservative mediocrity.
FINAL VERDICT: Two and a quarter stars out of four. The 2010 Lincoln MKZ aims for distinction in a crowded field of entry-level luxury, but lands squarely in the milquetoast middle. The MKZ isn’t the right car for everybody, but with a handful of standard options the other guy doesn’t have, it’s a good car for somebody.

Aaron Cole is the managing editor of The Aurora Sentinel. Reach him at 303-750-7555 or at acole@aurorasentinel.com.

Distributed by Colorado Capitol Reporters

Posted in Autos, Front PageComments (0)

Review: Will You Drive A Mini-Rover When You Can Super Size?

Review: Will You Drive A Mini-Rover When You Can Super Size?

By Aaron Cole, THE AURORA SENTINEL
Last month, seven automakers sold slightly fewer cars in the U.S. than Land Rover did.
The list: Bentley, Rolls Royce, Porsche, Ferrari, Maserati, Lamborghini — and, on the other side of size and speed, SMART.
What one could derive from that list of exclusive automakers is that Americans don’t like them expensive, and they don’t like them small.
So imagine how well Land Rover’s LR2, which runs over $40,000 and is a pint-sized version of their $100,000 Range Rover, did in sales. It’s a safe bet that more Picassos were sold in the month of June than Land Rover moved LR2s off the lot.
We Americans, strangely, like every single thing the LR2 has to offer though.
We like to overpay for things. See Whole Foods markets and Evian water. We like SUVs. See every Ford built between 2001 and 2007. And we even like unreliability. See Paris Hilton and Britney Spears.
Someone explain to me how these things aren’t selling out faster than a Jonas Brothers concert. More on that in a moment.
Similar from last year’s model, the 2009 version offers little improvement over the redesign from a year ago.
You still get the same 3.2-liter, six-cylinder power plant. You get the same 230 horses from it, too.
The same traction selector knob is standard on all models, and the same safety features that will keep you safe in a hurricane come with the LR2 as well.
In fact, the only real achievement over last year’s model was the HST package that offers a different body kit, and a couple of other doodads. I drove the HST in March, and it’s fair to say that the body kit adds so much uniqueness to the LR2 that I completely forgot I drove it.
Where the LR2 succeeds is that while Honda and Toyota — to an extent BMW, Mercedes and Audi — make cute ‘utes that your high-school-aged daughter would feel safe in, Land Rover makes a cute ‘ute that you wouldn’t want your daughter alone with.
The small SUV is a predator in every sense of the word.
Land Rover’s pedigree for making unstoppable off-roading tanks is carried forward in every inch of the LR2, which is a good thing if you’re looking for a mountain climbing mini-god, but is a bad thing if you’re looking for a tame, city-going car.
The LR2’s V6 powers like a V8 brute, but swigs gasoline at the same 15 mpg rate.
And there’s no sense in looking for the “High 4-Wheel Drive” and “Low 4-Wheel Drive” knob in this car — you get a knob to automatically adjust the suspension and gears for rain, snow, mud, mountain and hell.
So why doesn’t a brutus — albeit thirsty and expensive — fly off the shelves quicker than its pansy competitors?
Remember the six main automakers that sold fewer cars than Land Rover? Those manufacturers don’t offer smaller, cheaper versions of what they do best. You can’t buy a reasonable Rolls Royce.
Land Rover is known around the world for making snorkeling sub-tanks. A smaller version of that just doesn’t feel right.
Final Verdict: Two and a half stars out of four. The Land Rover LR2 is a snarling, small beast. But when it comes to its bigger brothers, the inflated price and the smaller stature doesn’t fit into the bigger picture.

Aaron Cole is the managing editor of The Aurora Sentinel. Reach him at 303-750-7555 or at acole@aurorasentinel.com.

Distributed by Colorado Capitol Reporters

Posted in Autos, Featured StoriesComments (0)


  • Popular
  • Latest
  • Comments
  • Tags
  • Subscribe