By Debi Brazzale, COLORADO NEWS AGENCY
It was a poetic moment for the former music teacher and longtime legislative advocate for the arts: Rep. Michael Merrifield’s proposal to require that classes on performing and visual arts be taught in all Colorado public schools made it over its first legislative hurdle today. Dubbed the “Merrifield Legacy Bill” by colleagues of the term-limited veteran Colorado Springs Democrat, House Bill 1273 passed the House Education Committee amid muted opposition and overwhelming support from those who came to testify on the legislation. The bill is now headed to the House floor.
The measure also passed over objections of two Republican dissenters, who said they could not impose the mandate on local school districts that are struggling financially.
The concern was echoed by representatives of the public school district boards and adminstrators. Jane Urschel, of the Colorado Association of School Boards, said unfunded mandates at a time when schools are tightening their belts made the bill unworkable and that the school boards regrettably could not support the bill.
“This is perhaps the most difficult testimony that I’ve ever given,” said Urschel. “The intent of this bill is genius but how the bill is executed is not. We can’t have art on demand by the state–that decision has to be made locally.”
Also opposing the bill, and delivered with the same regrets, was the Colorado Association of School Executives. Both groups suggested that if the mandate were replaced with an incentive for the schools, they could support the bill.
Rep. Ken Summers, R-Lakewood, voted for the bill but agreed with Urschel and said he would prefer incentives over mandates as well.
“We’ll need creative accounting to pay for this,” Summers said.
Yet, the overwhelming majority of those who came to speak to the committee spoke emphatically in favor of requiring an arts curriculum in public education. Many who spoke were students or former students whose lives were enriched by their exposure to the arts. Others said they simply couldn’t imagine an education without art.
“Performing arts are just as important as math and reading. To have an education without these things is just unthinkable,” said Dan Ritchie, the former University of Denver chancellor who has an arena on the DU campus named after him.
Some lawmakers, such as Rep. Judy Solano, D-Brighton, lamented the loss of arts in favor of math and science–which she said are given priority for the sake of standardized testing. She said only wealthier schools have the means to support arts in the curriculum.
“High-stakes testing has crowded out the arts, especially in lower-income schools,” said Solano.
Rep. Nancy Todd, D-Aurora, a former schoolteacher, said she always found ways to integrate the arts into curriculum and that Merrifield’s measure mandating the arts curriculum won’t be burdensome on school districts.
“I don’t look at this as a mandate. With my students, I took their artistic sense and was able to integrate the arts into other subject areas,” said Todd.
Mark Hudson, of the Colorado Music Education Association, said it came down to deciding what’s most important.
“Can we afford to do this? The question is–can we afford not to?” Hudson asked the committee.
Merrifield said the measure is simply overdue.
“There are ways for us to be creative in finding a way to do this,” said Merrifield. “I’m calling this the ‘no more buts’ bill.”
Stay ahead by signing up for State Bill E-News! >